Sir – I write to agree with Mr Chappell’s letter to your paper.

He highlights one of borough residents’ major complaints against the council and – at the same time – calls into question the much publicised council’s avowed consultation process as outlined in Councillor Serge Lourie’s statement in the recent edition of Yellow Pages and the council’s overview and scrutiny process (the autumn Arcadia magazine).

I quote from the Yellow Pages: “We [the council] are intent on delivering a scheme that has real benefit to the community. Consultation is the key, and we listen to the opinions and concerns of local people...put forward your views and ideas.”

From Arcadia Scrutiny’s mission statement pledges to “reflect the voice and concerns of the public and its communities.

“As a result, the council actively encourages public involvement in the process.”

Against these laudable sentiments the reality is somewhat different.

Asked for evidence of residents’ support of the Riverside proposal, none have been forthcoming, whereas the same 4,500 signatories to petitions not in support of the proposal have been dismissed by the council, which pronounced that “anyone will sign a petition”.

Coun Lourie has been visiting premises displaying “Save our Riverside” posters saying the council has revised plans for the Riverside.

Where are they? When will we be consulted and become part of the council’s process?

Perhaps the Richmond United Group meeting at St Mary’s Hall on October 14 at 8pm could throw light on to these matters.

The group has invited a speaker from the council to express their views in an attempt to explore the possibility of ensuring open discussion with affected parties at all stages of planning.

D K WILLIAMS
Flood Lane
Twickenham